Atlantica and the Coy Agenda for Continental Integration
by Charles Fournier
Monday, Apr. 17, 2006 at 2:53 PM
c.fournier@rogers.com 506.471.3066 3-224 Brunswick Fredericton
What the business elite is not telling you about Atlantica.
The Atlantica concept is an enigma for most people
in the Atlantic Provinces. It is an agenda that has brought elites in
the region to a consensus that Atlantic Canada and eastern Quebec needs
to economically, socially and politically integrate with Maine, New
Hampshire, Vermont and Upstate New York to form a single coherent
entity. The chief proponents of this concept are Brian Lee Crowley,
President of the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies (AIMS), and Jim
Quigley, President of the Atlantic Provinces Chambers of Commerce
(APCC) and Vice-President of the Bank of Montreal. They have been
promoting the “Atlantica” concept to Business and political leaders in
the region. Most have not been made aware of the designs they are
drawing, and would abhor their Neo-conservative prescriptions for the
future of Atlantic Canada.
Mr. Crowley and AIMS have been the
chief architect of the Atlantica concept. AIMS is a well funded big
business think tank, with Atlantica Canada’s wealthiest families
represented on it’s Board of Directors, that is based out of Halifax.
In a speech to an APCC meeting in Montague PEI on May 29th of 2004,
Crowley laid out his vision of “Atlantica” which contained three
central ideas. The first of which is to turn the Atlantic Provinces and
New England into a “transport intensive economy”. To accomplish this
would mean doing two things. Firstly, building a highway from St.
Stephen, NB through New England to Cornwall ON, and Montreal. Secondly,
upgrading the Halifax port to accommodate Post-Panamax sized cargo
ships. Crowley doesn’t take into account the fact that the world is
running out Oil. Also the trade routes he wants to create by-pass
Newfoundland and the Francophone regions of New Brunswick.
The second and most alarming central idea to “Atlantica” is Continental
Integration. This follows from a report called “Building a North
American Community” written by the “Task Force for the Future of North
America” which is an ad hoc coalition of the Canadian Council of Chief
Executes, the US Council on Foreign Relations and their Mexican
counterparts the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internationals. The
document makes 41 sweeping recommendations that read like a Christmas
list for the Neo-Conservative hawks that are now in power south of the
border. The recommendations centre around, first, creating an
integrated North American Military and Law Enforcement Security
apparatus that would transcend national boundaries and building a
common North American security perimeter. Secondly, they call for an
expansion of the NAFTA agreement to include Non-Tariff barriers to
Trade (i.e. Public Services and cultural protections) and the
harmonisation of Government regulations between Canada, the US and
Mexico.
Many of the recommendations of the report are already
being implemented such as the “Smart Regs” initiative of the Martin
Government which took the first steps towards regulatory harmonisation.
The recommendations, if implemented, would decimate Canadian
sovereignty. Canada would no longer be able set it’s own regulation
around food safety, health, the environment and slew of other
jurisdictions. By far the most frightening recommendations are around
defence and boarder security which would expand NORAD into a
“Multi-service Defence Command” or one central military command for all
of North America.
The other recommendations around energy,
the creation of new tri-national institutions and immigration are just
as draconian and would be met with disgust by the average Canadian. The
Continental Integration agenda being lobbied for by the nation’s
business elites would be the end of Canada as a sovereign nation and
the consolidation of US power over North America.
The third
central idea of the “Atlantica” concept is “Regional Coherence
Building”. This means integrating energy infrastructure and creating
new cross border institutions that would replace previous structures
and deepen the geo-political relationship between Atlantic Canada and
the New England States. Much of the impetus for this has come from the
Federal government which directed the Policy Research Initiative (PRI)
to study “Cross Border Economic regions” through the North American
linkages research project. PRI has set up five regional roundtables
dream up cross border economic regions from coast to coast.
What is carefully omitted from this Vision of Atlantica are the
implications it carries for the standard of living of working people.
The phrase “non-tariff barriers to trade” is glossy terminology for
removing any public institution, act of legislation or government
regulation that inhibits the ability of business to make profit. The
APCC is hosting a conference in Saint John from June 8-10th called
“Reaching Atlantica: Business Without Boundaries”. This kind of
language leads one to wonder how far they will take this and if
anything is sacred? Proponents of Atlantica, such as Crowley, Jim
Quigley and Dennis Savoie are already talking about scrapping minimum
wage legislation, privatising health care, restricting access to
employment insurance, decertifying unions and closing rural
communities. The Conference’s largest sponsors are the Bank of Montreal
and Irving Oil.
What is more unsettling is that the Atlantica
Concept does not offer any ideas for the basic resource industries that
have been the traditional economic activity of Atlantic Canada for
centuries. Not a word of mention for farming, forestry and the fishery,
all industries which have experienced major closures and economic
setbacks in recent years causing untold hardship for working people.
Also, Atlantica offers no solutions to the major challenges that are
confronting our collective future in Atlantic Canada including the
out-migration of young people and the acute aging of the population,
the challenges posed by climate change, and the precipitous decline in
the standard of living for the majority of Atlantic Canadians.
In the same pattern as the negotiations for NAFTA, the WTO and the
FTAA, civil society groups are not at the table nor are they invited to
the Atlantica negotiations. On the official promotional website for the
“Reaching Atlantica: Business Without Boundaries” conference those
invited are: “small business owners, CEO’s, managers and executives, as
well as Government representatives from the four Atlantic Provinces and
the US Northeast”. What is more astounding is how discrete the planning
for this conference has been. There has been no mention in the print or
broadcast media. The secretive nature should set off warning bells in
civil society. If they don’t want you at the table then they are likely
planning something that you won’t like.
The Atlantica concept
needs to be exposed for what it really is, an attack on our social
programs and rights for working people and the environment, a big
business free for all and the annexation of Atlantic Canada by the
United States.